What surprising me the most.

I think I was surprised at the beginning when somebody corrected my typo not long after my edit. I had felt nobody would care what I do on Wikipedia, which might be the reason sometimes people misbehave, but when I got the feedback quite instantly, I felt that Wikipedia is alive and I gotta be careful putting the right information.
Also, the surprising thing is that there is nothing we can't do as long as we try. I remember that I was wondering why I couldn't put the picture of a company into the infobox. Peter said that was weird too and he helped me to ask people around how to do so or if we could do that. Wikpedians helped us to create a new line in the infobox which we can add a picture, and I felt so proud of doing it. As I was told during the class, we can't know everything, but we can surely try to do what we want to do, and there are always people out there trying to help me out to make Wikipedia better and more trustworthy. That's what I was surprised the most about Wikipedia.

w4. my wiki edits

this week i edited 10 articles in Korean and English.

I focused on people.

first person is Dongju-Yun. He is a poet.
I put some details about his life, works and references.

and I make it correct my Cheongju article that you mentioned.
Also I added information about person Hyeonmoo-Jeon, who is very famous celebrity as a MC
I tried to make a additional materials in articles
So, I added his award history, education background, programs that he did and his public website link in reference part.

More I make articles, More I learn it better.

About enable e-mail

teacher.

you requset to me enable my email

Is this right?

W4. My weekly edits

 Thanks to Wikipedia Adventure, I could learn a lot of skills about Wikipedia. But I still have problems about Wikipedia. I should study more and more about Wikipedia. Here are the things that I learned last week.

 First, I could use Wikipedia Commons. It was really fun and exciting. I love taking picture using my camera. So I will much use Wikipedia commons in the future. I edited 5 articles(3 in English, 2 in Korean) and used 5 my picture through Wikipedia Commons. And Someone gave me some thanks message!! :-) It was my best time in Wikipedia. 

Second, I wanted to fix my old article. It was translate article when I took 'Globalization' last semester. But I think I still don't know how to fix it perfectly. Because I'm still not good at editing articles...  

How can I made like this?

and..

this??

and what do they mean and how can I edit reference like this?

I will appreciate someone teach these things. :)

And Here are my last week's edits.

(You can see bigger when you click the image)

W4. About my edits last week

 I made some mistakes relating to references and copyrights while editing last week as I presented in class. I tried to paraphrase the edits about Korean food on English wikipedia, but I am not sure that it is okay. And similar thing happened on Korean wikipedia. When I added a book reference for my edit, someone asked me to check if I COPIED and PASTED contents in the reference. I was a little embarrased, but it was an opportunity to understand trustworthy information and references. Also, it was helpful to know how to use Wikipedia and how Wikipedia works. I could learn about when we can use and trust information on Wikipedia or any other websites. I think it was a good experience.

B5. Can we trust Wikipedia?

I want to ask first 'can I trust Wikipedia?'. My answer would be 'pretty much yes'.I remember that I said 'the more I use Wikipedia, the more I trust this encyclopedia because I could feel that it is alive with many people working on this' during last semester. I have an opinion now which is similar as last year but kind of different. I somehow think it is upon one's ability to be able to trust Wikipedia or not. If one knows how to use/navigate Wikipedia properly, Wikipedia would be really trustworthy, but if the one doesn't know how to do so, it is much more likely to have distorted information. So, I would like to encourage many people who only use Wikipedia for getting information to actually try to edit and know more about how it works so that they can distinguish good and bad information. Someone said not to use Wikipedia as the end of information, but to use this as the start of searching. I agree with that. We can definitely start searching with Wikipedia, but we shouldn't end the process in this, we need to check sources and different engines to make sure that the information in there can be trusted.

Why use Wikipedia?

   When I was young, there was a pack of encyclopedia in my room. The book was interesting and it was like a father to me because it taught me a lot. The time has passed and the 'internet' was presented. The communication between a person to a a person was only valid in the real world, off-line, however, the new on-line world dramatically changed the way of communication. Many people share memories of not only encyclopeia but also books from their young ages. As the internet develops every second, people's information and the new communication met and mixed. Nowadays through Wikipedia, people share their own encyclopedias online. For example, some might be a profession to music, and some might be a scientist and these two can share their expert information - which should be only TRUE - through Wikipedia. Human being is a social animal and it lives by communication. Wikipedia helps human being to communicate professional things.

first time in class

Today. very interesting study.

because i  announce first. it's so shake my heart. but it's good.

when this week, i want upload the picture about my edits.

but i't so difficult for me!.(copyright,etc...)

i think in wikipedia, copyright is so important. so uploading pictures is difficult. is this your? not your? yep.

finally i know how to upload images and use it. because i used ko.wiki. :) 

i know how to upload images, so i will make many edits.

but i don't know about }}{{I,[],*...etc it's extremely difficult. 

i think ctrl+c, ctrl+v is very good skill in computer. haha

Syllabus

You can download the full English syllabi from here.

Here is the Korean language summary:

<집단 지성 - Collective Intelligence in Practice>
1. 출석 - 5%
2. 토론 및 활동 - 15%
: 이 수업은 토론과 활동으로 구성되어있다. 학생들은 토론에 참석하고 질의응답을 하고 다른 활동에도 참여해야
한다. 메인 활동은 각 학생은 1분 내외의 발표를 해야한다.
3. 과제 - 30%
: 소그룹(2~3명)으로 구성하고 다음 주제와 관련된 적어도 2개의 아티클을 선택한다. (사회학, 집단지성, 한국)
- 선택한 아티클 중 하나는 영어로 된 것이어야 하며, 하나는 한국어여야 한다.
- 두 개의 아티클은 지역 위키 백과에서 개발해야하지만, 위키피디아에 별로 없거나 전혀 없는 항목이어야 한다.
- 수업을 진행하면서, 아티클을 추가하고, 번역을 할 것이다.
- 그룹 프로젝트와 같은 문서작업 뿐만 아니라, 모든 학생들은 다른 그룹의 아티클을 매주 정기적으로 위키피디아
를 편집해야 한다(영어 5번, 한국어 5번).
- 요구된 과제를 하지 못하면 한 주당 1점 차감
- 요구된 과제를 모두 한다면 추가점 가산
- 주요 일정
3월 17일 월 : 계정 및 그룹 발표 및 편집
3월 24일 월 : 기산 선택 및 회의
3월 31일 월 : 참고 문헌 및 참조 등을 추가
4월 14일 월 : 프로젝트 개요 및 2차 회의
5월 12일 월 : 비공식 리뷰 및 3차 회의
- 맞춰진 일정에 과제를 모두 수행하면 25%, 최종 과제 제출을 하면 25%(총 50%)
- 스케줄에 따라 과제를 수행하는 것이 매우 중요
- 또한 그룹 내 멤버 간 협력이 매우 중요 (최종 점수는 프로젝트 참여율에 따라 결정)
- 과제에 대한 내용은 다음 사이트에서 알 수 있다.
- 주의 깊게 보기 : 이 강의 계획서에 언급되지 않은 추가점에 대한 팁이 있음 - http://tiny.cc/wiki2014s
4. 온라인 블로그 포스팅 과제 - 30%
: 매주 우리의 블로그(http://socwiki2014s.blogspot.com/)에 블로그 포스트를 올려야 하며, 다른 학생들의 게시글에
코멘트를 달아야 한다.
+ 다음에 제시된 3개의 주제 중 하나를 할 수 있음
(1) 다음 주를 위한 리딩에 대한 블로그
- 다음 강의를 위해서 할당된 과제물을 수행해야하며 강의 전에 코멘트를 달고 블로그를 게시해야 한다.
- 이상적인 코멘트의 길이는 세 번째 줄(200단어)까지 써야 하며 세 가지의 섹션으로 나누어서 써야 한다.
- 섹션 : ➀ 읽은 것에 대해 요약
➁ 특이한 항목에 대해 배운 것 혹은 흥미롭거나 새로운 것에 대한 언급이 필요
➂ 적어도 하나의 질문이나 문제점 혹은 토론 거리
(2) 강의계획서에 나와있는 질문에 대해 블로그 할 수 있지만, 몇 주는 달라질 수 있다. 블로그의 구조는 유사해
야 하고, 그 다음주에 대한 할당된 과제에 다른 것을 추가 할 수 있다(과거 리딩, 강의 혹은 당신이 찾은 것
에 대한 어떤 것도 토론할 수 있음)
(3) 전 주에 위키피디아에서 편집했던 것을 토론 할 수 있음
- 블로그 포스트의 구조
➀ 편집한 것에 대한 링크 및 요약
➁ 특이한 항목에 대해 배운 것 혹은 흥미롭거나 새로운 것에 대한 언급이 필요
➂ 적어도 하나의 질문이나 문제점 혹은 토론 거리
+ 마감일 : 주요 블로그 게시물은 토요일 자정, 코멘트는 일요일 자정
+ 예외 : 첫 주에 대한 블로그 포스트는 그 주에 포스트 할 수 있다.
+ 다른 학생들의 블로그 포스트에 대한 적극적인 코멘트를 하나 이상 해야 함
+ 단순히 “동의합니다” 등의 댓글은 점수에 추가 되지 않음
+ 늦은 글과 코멘트는 허용되지 않음
+ 한국 이름과 영어이름 모두 사용
+ 이름이 없는 포스트는 채점하지 않음
+ 과제에 관해 도움이 필요하다면, 교수님 블로그 게시물 하단에 제공된 링크 참고
5. 추가 점수
- 우수한 블로그 포스트 : 필요한 길이보다 더 길거나, 비디오와 링크를 첨부 혹은 잘 포맷되어 있거나 잘 만들어
낸 토론주제
- 추가적인 블로그 포스트가 수업에서 발표되는 경우
- 수업과 토론에 활발하게 참여하는 경우
- 인증된 주제에서 영어로 된 위키피디아 아티클을 만들어내거나, 이미 존재하는 것을 향상시키는 경우
- 새롭고 우수한 아티클은 추가로 5점을 가산
- 이 수업을 통해서 다양한 방법으로 배우길 원한다.
그래서 추가 점수 활동의 하나에만 집중되어 있다면 그것이 훌륭할지라도 결국 낮은 점수를 받게 될 것이다.
- 만약 한 개의 활동을 통해서 10점을 받았다면 다른 분야의 활동을 추가적으로 해야하며, 만약 하나의 활동에 머
물러 있다면 낮은 점수를 줄 것이다.
Summary
출석 : 5%
위키페이퍼 : 50%
토론 : 15%
과제 - 블로그 : 30%
추가 점수 : ?%
총 100%

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it?

I think Wikipedia is the one of the most handy encyclopedia. If you can access the internet, and your country can access to Wikipedia, you can use Wikipedia anytime and anyplace. There are about 200 languages in Wikipedia. So everyone in Earth can use this useful encyclopedia. The motto of Wikipedia also can be explained about this. 'The free encyclopedia that any one can edit' is a very fascinating.
Wikipedia never makes it if just one person edit it. I think we edit Wikipedia for the completion of modern knowledge. We are performing ours duty like this now.  Someone just enjoys editing Wikipedia. But all of us who use Wikipedia will make our knowledge system ultimately.

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it?

I think the reason why people use Wikipedia is related to how Wiki works. All men have a desire to know deeper knowledge. On Wikipedia, people can develop their knowledge by editing articles or by discussing with others. As we know, Wikipedia is operated by many people's collaboration. we can improve our knowledge and also provide more information on wiki for free. And also This process of exchanging opinions is regarded as contributions of human being's knowledge and making better world. These aspects of Wikipedia become more attractive the more we use it. And compared to other websites' searching, the information on Wikipedia is easier to find sources and references, so it can be trustworthy. These are the reasons why people use Wikipedia and write for it, I think.

W4 Interesting article about Wikipedia

집단지성의 상징, 위키피디아 퇴조 징후

주영재 기자 jyj@kyunghyang.com

이 기사 어땠나요?

“위키피디아가 점점 구식이 되고 있다.” 프랑스 주간 르 누벨 옵서바퇴르는 26일자 온라인 기사에서 문서작성자의 수가 지속적인 감소세를 보이고 문서의 신뢰성에 대한 의문이 커지면서 위키피디아가 퇴조 징후를 보이고 있다고 보도했다. 

문서작성자의 수가 지속적인 감소세를 보이고 문서의 신뢰성에 대한 의문이 커지면서 위키피디아가 퇴조 징후를 보이고 있다. 누벨옵서바퇴르기사캡쳐(http://bibliobs.nouvelobs.com/en-partenariat-avec-books/20140124.OBS3713/wikipedia-est-de-plus-en-plus-obsolete.html)

위키피디아는 영어로 작성된 문서만 매달 약 440만개, 약 10억 페이지가 만들어지면서 양적으로는 지속적으로 성장하고 있지만 기하급수적 성장세는 한 풀 꺽이고 퇴조세를 보이고 있다. <MIT기술저널> 최근호는 위키피디아 문서 기여자의 수가 2007년 이후 꾸준히 줄고 있으며 영어판의 경우 5만1000명에서 현재 3만1000명으로 줄어들었다고 전했다. 

특히 새로 유입된 문서 기여자들의 수가 점점 줄고 있으며 활동기간도 짧아지고 있다. 문서기여자의 수가 문서 질을 판단하는 척도가 될 수는 없지만 활동기간이 짧아진다는 점은 문서의 전문성이 떨어질 수 있음을 의미한다. 위키피디아를 운영하는 비영리단체 위키미디어의 슈 가드너 대표도 위기를 인정하며 “위키피디아는 처음 출범했던 2001년의 세상에 완벽하게 적응했었지만 점점 구식이 되어 가고 있다”고 말했다. 

퇴조의 한 원인으로 조작으로 인한 신뢰도 하락이 거론된다. 옵서바퇴르는 “위키피디아의 문서가 건강과 환경, 역사와 정치·경제와 관련된 중요한 문제들에서 때때로 명백히 이해관계에 얽혀있는 행위자들에 의한 조작으로 잘못 작성되고 있다”고 밝혔다. 이해관계나 선호도에 따라 문서가 작성되는 ‘아마추어 문화’로 악화가 양화를 구축하는 현상을 보이고 있다는 지적이다. 

위키피디아는 문서를 훼손하지 못하게 편집을 제한한 경우를 제외하고 누구라도 삭제·수정할 수 있어 조작의 위험성을 안고 있다. 위키피디아에서 여론조작 행위는 2007년 8월 BBC 방송이 “미국 중앙정보국(CIA)과 로마 교황청이 위키피디아의 편집을 조작하고 있다”고 폭로하면서 논란이 됐고, 한국에서도 지난해 4월 미디어오늘이 국정원 관계자로 추정되는 사용자가 국정원의 정치 개입 사건과 관련한 문서를 지속적으로 삭제, 조작했다고 보도한 적이 있다. 


‘인용필요’로 대표되는 위키피디아의 문서 작성 규칙도 문서의 신뢰성을 약화시키고 있다. 위키피디아에서 주장의 신빙성을 뒷받침하는 사실상 유일한 증거로 ‘인용’ 방식이 사용되지만 정작 인용이 된 글의 신뢰성을 검증할 방법이 없기 때문이다. 

사회관계망 서비스에서 이타적인 이념이 약해지고 자기중심성이 강해지고 있다는 점도 원인으로 지목된다. 아메리칸 대학의 클레이 셔키는 “2000년대 초반 인터넷 발달을 촉진시켰던 이타성이 페이스북이나 트위터와 같은 사회관계망 서비스가 지향하는 자기본위적 사고 방식에 자리를 내줬다”고 말했다.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I found an interesting article from France about Wikipedia which might be good to discuss with the classmates since trust issue of Wikipedia is one of our coming lectures.

Basically this article is saying that Wikipedia is getting old, and it is not getting better. This article pointed out that the number of contributors have been decreased since 2007, and it came to 31000 from 51000. It says the period of being an active Wikipedian is getting shorter and that could mean articles's context can be doubt-able. 

One of many reasons of Wikipedia being old is trustworthiness, because anyone can edit and they can write for their stands with a few examples. Also there is no way we can clarify of cited information. Another reason is that people are seeking individualism.

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them.

I don't remember exactly, but my first edit is history about Korea. When i studied history and i want to get some information, so i find in Wikipedia. but Wikipedia information is different form my memory. so i fixed the subject.

W 1. What do t know about Wikipedia and what do i want to learn about it?

I know Wikipedia is very big dictionary. but many of dictionary is made the book style. Wikipedia is different. 1. Wikipedia is not paper. It is internet dictionary. 2. Wikipedia can quick fix about subject. 3. Wikipedia is made by every people, not only expert.

I want to learn how make Wikipedia, and i want know how many people participate Wikipedia.

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them.

* English
The first one that I edited is "administrative districts in Cheongju city"
Cheongju city is my hometown. And the administrative districts will be changed in July first. So, if you search the Cheongju city in Wiki, you can find this edit.
Second is about "Related place with Gangnam"
there is just writen Gangnam station and Gangman-gu office station. so i put more information about subway station. Gangnam station is seoul subway line 2 and Gangnam-gu office station is seoul subway line 7 and Bundayg line.
Third is Tteokbokki. Tteokbokki is selled in street vendors and pojangmacha. So, I add one more place "Franchise snack bar"that sell Tteokbokki.
I translated about Hodugwaj which is korean walnut cookie to English.
"Jecheon is located in north of Chungcheongbuk-do near Wonju city and Yeongwol city which is located in Gangwon-do"- edit more detailed information about Jecheon(location)
*Korean
I search "College Scholastic Ability Test". In the part of "how to run", some sentences could be an argument in my opinion. "If students are late in test, police or firefighter can bring them to place where test are done." So I deleted this part.
The article of New york city subway is well translated but, one sentence was awkward. I changed the sentence more natural.
Hanyang university Ansan campus has 7 strategic departments. But in Wiki, there are only 4 departments. so I upgraded information refer to website of our school.
the key word is "가평군" and you can find "축제" which means Festival. I knew the annual Jarasum singsing Winter Festival in January
the festival named Rainbow music&camping Festival will be held in Nami island. I put this information and web link in "남이섬" newly.

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it?

I just heard that Wiki is the one of online encyclopedia that people can share their mind. So I wondered whether I can believe information written by non experts. But whenever I search key words in Google, I can find the information from Wikipedia easily. And also, it's really specific and detailed information. In addition, when I search the data in NAVER or kinds of Korean web portal link, It is connected with Wikipedia as a Knowledge encyclopedia.

I want to use Wikipedia by searching the international encyclopedia and adding information about Korea. I think that Wiki can be a great opportunity to inform Korea to global citizen.

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them.

My first edits was in 2010. I took professor Yoon's class at that time. So I edited Wikipedia as a practical exercise for the first time . I was very interested in Korean pop singer. so I edited SHINEE and Supreme Team's articles. Especially, Supreme Team, the Korean famous hiphop duo released their first regular record in 2010. So I edited about their first regular record. I thought that editing Wikipedia is help for unfamiliar things. We can edit Something that is not famous for many people, but I have detailed knowledge about that. And we can get some pride about that. I got some pride at that time. Or I can edit missing things. When I edited SHINEE's article, there are almost all about SHINEE. But I found something that is missing their history. So I edited missing o.s.t album's information.

W1. What do I know you about Wikipedia and What do I want to learn about it?

When I was a freshman, I met Wikipedia in the professor Yoon's class. I learned that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and it is made by collective intelligence at that time. However, class of Wikipedia was very small part of his class. So I just know that about Wikipedia. And last year, I took your class, Globalization. I edited 'proto-globalization', but I still don't know what exactly Wikipedia and collective intelligence is.
I want to know why Wikipedia is famous for all over the world and Why do we need Wikipedia and so on. I will do my best this semester to know more about Wikipedia.

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them.

 My first edit on Wikipedia was about French. I am interested in French. I studied it when I was in high school, but I couldn’t do more because I had to prepare for college. So I learned French after I entered university by self-study. I had to search the information about French like words and grammar. I searched ordinal numbers in French, but there was not enough articles on Korean Wikipedia. Thus, I added some information about French ordinal numbers. It was exciting and satisfying to add information of the area that I feel interest.

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it?

 I just heard about Wikipedia that has lots of academic information, and I know the information on Wikipedia is made by many people. It is interesting and attractive to make useful information by volunteering. Also, the knowledge on Wikipedia is helpful for studying. It has neutral point of view on any issues, so I think I can improve ability to have deep views of things. I want to learn how to use Wikipedia and how to find information that is trustworthy. I realized that finding and collecting data is promising skill for information society. And I hope to have an opportunity for understanding information sociology by learning collective intelligence through this class.

W3. The most impressive Wikipedia story.

'의학위키피디아' 올모스트어닥터 성공스토리 화제

 | 기사입력 2014-01-08 01:08 

설립자 톰 리치, 평범한 의대생에서 세계의학도 멘토로 변신

(런던=연합뉴스) 김태한 특파원 = 평범한 의대생에서 전 세계 의학도의 '온라인 멘토'로 떠오른 영국인 청년의 성공스토리가 화제가 되고 있다.

의학전공자 사이에 '의학 위키피디아'로 통하는 의학정보 사이트 '올모스트어닥터'(almostadoctor.com) 운영자 톰 리치(26) 씨가 주인공이다.

7일(현지시간) 영국 일간지 인디펜던트에 따르면 올모스트어닥터는 2009년 문을 연 이후 4년여 만에 전 세계 수천 명의 회원을 보유한 의학 분야의 대표적인 정보공유 사이트로 성장했다.

이 사이트는 맨체스터 의대생이던 리치가 친구들과 학습 노트를 공유할 목적으로 처음 문을 열었다.

리치는 되도록 많은 정보가 공유될 수 있도록 친구와 선후배들을 설득해 다량의 학습노트와 첨삭자료, 연구논문 등을 수집해 회원들과 공유했다. 이런 노력이 차츰 소문이 나면서 사이트에 올라오는 자료와 정보들도 증가했다.

그는 "어느 날 보니 대학 도서관에서 처음 보는 학생들이 줄을 서서 내 노트를 출력하고 있었다"고 회고했다.

올모스트어닥터는 현재 전 세계 의학도의 최신 논문과 학습노트가 공유되는 의학전문 정보 서비스로 권위를 인정받고 있다.

대학 졸업 후 호주에서 의사로 활약하는 리치는 "사이트에 올라오는 정보는 분야별로 박사학위를 보유한 편집진들이 내용을 검증하고, 이해하기 쉽게 편집하는 과정을 거친다"고 말했다.

리치는 세계적인 전문정보 사이트의 설립자가 됐지만 여전히 금전적 보상은 기대하지 않고 있다.

올모스트어닥터는 현재 스마트폰으로도 서비스를 제공하고 있지만 회원의 자발적 참여와 무료 정책을 고집하고 있다.

의학 학술지 헬스서비스저널은 지난 연말 '2013년의 혁신가'로 올모스터어닥터 설립자인 리치를 선정한 바 있다.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------This article is about a guy, called Tom Rich, who runs 'almostadoctor.com.' He gathered as much information as possible about his major, medical science, and share it with people for free. He became a founder of the medical website which has the highest authority, and he was awarded as '2013 innovator' by Health Service Journal. 

W2. My first article. Describe what you learned from it.

Since I took this class last time and wrote about my first edit already, I am going to write this time about my first article that I made.
I believe that my first article is about 황경신. I made that article because I thought she was worthy being in Wikipedia as a writer. After I made my first article, I proudly showed that to my professor because I felt great that I can not only edit, but also create a new article. I still remember my professor's comment which was really solid. He was that the article needs to show that why this person is worthy being in Wikipedia, and it is people, in other words, collective intelligence, to decide that. So I put some references and made infobox to make the article look good and has notability. It is amazing that Wikipedia never stops and keeps moving to make the information it has correct every single minute.

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and wha do I want to learn about it?

I hadn't known about Wikipedia well until I took the last class. Since we learned about Wikipedia, I think I am quite familiar with how Wikipedia works and how to use it. I know the basic principle of prople to use/edit Wikipedia is that they find this fun. No one do this expecting any rewards, I guess, almost no one. Wikipedia is trying to keep the neutral point of view in any matters, and it's open to people arguing and exchanging their opinions. I believe that it exactly shows that how collective intelligence runs. 

Knowing some about Wikipedia got me some benefits during my winter internship. When I was told to search some information, I know how to search and what to trust. 

In this class, I want to learn about Wikipedia more in depth, and other collective intelligence if possible. Also, by simply taking this class, it is a good and steady motivation for me to edit Wikipedia and contribute to our sum of knowledge.

My first wikipedia edit

     My first edit was with the class 'sociology of globalization'. The task was to translate any article which is related to globalization and I chose one of popular articles which was about k-pop. Actually I am into that business and doing it as a profession, thus the work was pretty interesting to me. I am sure that I am the first and only k-pop artist who participated in wikipedia about k-pop. I would like to develop my participation in wikipedia through this class and thrilling to use my experiences to this world-wide collective intelligence.